「ディズニープラス」契約者は訴え起こせず、不法死亡訴訟でディズニー側が主張
Disney Plus subscribers cannot sue, Disney claims in wrongful death lawsuit.
Disney Plus subscribers cannot sue, Disney claims in wrongful death lawsuit.
米ディズニーのテーマパーク内の飲食店で食事をした後に急死した女性の夫が、ディズニー側に過失があったとしてウォルト・ディズニー・パークス＆リゾーツなどを訴えている裁判で、ディズニー側が原告の男性の「ディズニープラス」契約を理由に訴えを退けるよう求めている
In a lawsuit in which the husband of a woman who suddenly died after eating at a restaurant at a Disney theme park is suing Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, etc., alleging that Disney was negligent, Disney has filed a lawsuit against the male plaintiff. They are requesting that the lawsuit be dismissed based on the Disney Plus contract.
In a lawsuit in which the husband of a woman who suddenly died after eating at a restaurant at a Disney theme park is suing Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, etc., alleging that Disney was negligent, Disney has filed a lawsuit against the male plaintiff. They are requesting that the lawsuit be dismissed based on the Disney Plus contract.
原告は、ニューヨークの医師だった妻を亡くしたジェフリー・ピッコロさん
The plaintiff is Jeffrey Piccolo, whose wife, who was a doctor in New York, died.
The plaintiff is Jeffrey Piccolo, whose wife, who was a doctor in New York, died.
妻は２０２３年１０月にウォルト・ディズニー・ワールド内の飲食店で食事した後、激しいアレルギー反応を起こして死亡した
His wife died in October 2023 after suffering a severe allergic reaction after eating at a restaurant at Walt Disney World.
His wife died in October 2023 after suffering a severe allergic reaction after eating at a restaurant at Walt Disney World.
訴訟の中でピッコロさん側は、飲食店でアレルゲンがないことを何度も確認してメニューを注文したにもかかわらず、妻は乳製品とナッツに対するアレルギー反応を起こして死亡したと主張
In the lawsuit, Mr. Piccolo claims that his wife died from an allergic reaction to dairy products and nuts, despite ordering the menu after repeatedly checking to make sure there were no allergens at the restaurant.
In the lawsuit, Mr. Piccolo claims that his wife died from an allergic reaction to dairy products and nuts, despite ordering the menu after repeatedly checking to make sure there were no allergens at the restaurant.
ディズニーと飲食店側に過失があったとして、５万ドル（約７４０万円）超の損害賠償を求めている
The company is seeking more than $50,000 (approximately 7.4 million yen) in damages, alleging negligence on the part of Disney and the restaurant.
The company is seeking more than $50,000 (approximately 7.4 million yen) in damages, alleging negligence on the part of Disney and the restaurant.
これに対してディズニー側は、ピッコロさんが１９年に動画配信サービスのディズニープラスで１カ月の無料トライアルを契約していたことを理由に、訴えを退けるよう求めた
In response, Disney requested that the lawsuit be dismissed on the grounds that Piccolo had signed up for a one-month free trial of the video distribution service Disney+ in 2019.
In response, Disney requested that the lawsuit be dismissed on the grounds that Piccolo had signed up for a one-month free trial of the video distribution service Disney+ in 2019.
トライアル契約には、紛争が発生した場合は全てディズニーとの仲裁によって解決するという条項が含まれていた
The trial agreement included a clause that all disputes would be resolved through arbitration with Disney.
The trial agreement included a clause that all disputes would be resolved through arbitration with Disney.
ディズニー側はさらに、ピッコロさんがウォルト・ディズニー・パークスの公式サイトを利用して入園チケットを購入していたことを理由に、ピッコロさん側がディズニーを相手取って訴訟を起こすことはできないと主張している
Disney further argues that Piccolo cannot sue Disney because he used the official Walt Disney Parks website to purchase park tickets.
Disney further argues that Piccolo cannot sue Disney because he used the official Walt Disney Parks website to purchase park tickets.
ディズニー側の主張についてピッコロさんの弁護士は、ディズニープラスの無料トライアルを契約すると関連会社や子会社に対して陪審裁判を求める権利がなくなるという主張は「あまりにも言語道断であり不当」と訴えた
Regarding Disney’s argument, Piccolo’s lawyer argued that the claim that signing up for a free trial of Disney Plus would eliminate the right to a jury trial against affiliates and subsidiaries is ``extraordinary and unjust.’’
Regarding Disney’s argument, Piccolo’s lawyer argued that the claim that signing up for a free trial of Disney Plus would eliminate the right to a jury trial against affiliates and subsidiaries is ``extraordinary and unjust.’’
「ディズニープラス」契約者は訴え起こせず、不法死亡訴訟でディズニー側が主張
Disney Plus subscribers cannot sue, Disney claims in wrongful death lawsuit
Disney Plus subscribers cannot sue, Disney claims in wrongful death lawsuit
米ディズニーのテーマパーク内の飲食店で食事をした後に急死した女性の夫が、ディズニー側に過失があったとしてウォルト・ディズニー・パークス＆リゾーツなどを訴えている裁判で、ディズニー側が原告の男性の「ディズニープラス」契約を理由に訴えを退けるよう求めている
In a lawsuit in which the husband of a woman who suddenly died after eating at a restaurant at a Disney theme park is suing Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, etc., alleging that Disney was negligent, Disney has filed a lawsuit against the male plaintiff. They are requesting that the lawsuit be dismissed based on the Disney Plus contract.
In a lawsuit in which the husband of a woman who suddenly died after eating at a restaurant at a Disney theme park is suing Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, etc., alleging that Disney was negligent, Disney has filed a lawsuit against the male plaintiff. They are requesting that the lawsuit be dismissed based on the Disney Plus contract.
原告は、ニューヨークの医師だった妻を亡くしたジェフリー・ピッコロさん
The plaintiff is Jeffrey Piccolo, whose wife, who was a doctor in New York, died.
The plaintiff is Jeffrey Piccolo, whose wife, who was a doctor in New York, died.
妻は２０２３年１０月にウォルト・ディズニー・ワールド内の飲食店で食事した後、激しいアレルギー反応を起こして死亡した
His wife died in October 2023 after suffering a severe allergic reaction after eating at a restaurant at Walt Disney World.
His wife died in October 2023 after suffering a severe allergic reaction after eating at a restaurant at Walt Disney World.
訴訟の中でピッコロさん側は、飲食店でアレルゲンがないことを何度も確認してメニューを注文したにもかかわらず、妻は乳製品とナッツに対するアレルギー反応を起こして死亡したと主張
In the lawsuit, Piccolo claims that his wife died from an allergic reaction to dairy products and nuts, despite ordering the menu after checking multiple times to make sure there were no allergens at the restaurant.
In the lawsuit, Piccolo claims that his wife died from an allergic reaction to dairy products and nuts, despite ordering the menu after checking multiple times to make sure there were no allergens at the restaurant.
ディズニーと飲食店側に過失があったとして、５万ドル（約７４０万円）超の損害賠償を求めている
The company is seeking more than $50,000 (approximately 7.4 million yen) in damages, alleging negligence on the part of Disney and the restaurant.
The company is seeking more than $50,000 (approximately 7.4 million yen) in damages, alleging negligence on the part of Disney and the restaurant.
これに対してディズニー側は、ピッコロさんが１９年に動画配信サービスのディズニープラスで１カ月の無料トライアルを契約していたことを理由に、訴えを退けるよう求めた
In response, Disney requested that the lawsuit be dismissed on the grounds that Piccolo had signed up for a one-month free trial of the video distribution service Disney+ in 2019.
In response, Disney requested that the lawsuit be dismissed on the grounds that Piccolo had signed up for a one-month free trial of the video distribution service Disney+ in 2019.
トライアル契約には、紛争が発生した場合は全てディズニーとの仲裁によって解決するという条項が含まれていた
The trial agreement included a clause that all disputes would be resolved through arbitration with Disney.
The trial agreement included a clause that all disputes would be resolved through arbitration with Disney.
ディズニー側はさらに、ピッコロさんがウォルト・ディズニー・パークスの公式サイトを利用して入園チケットを購入していたことを理由に、ピッコロさん側がディズニーを相手取って訴訟を起こすことはできないと主張している
Disney further argues that Piccolo cannot sue Disney because he used the official Walt Disney Parks website to purchase park tickets.
Disney further argues that Piccolo cannot sue Disney because he used the official Walt Disney Parks website to purchase park tickets.
ディズニー側の主張についてピッコロさんの弁護士は、ディズニープラスの無料トライアルを契約すると関連会社や子会社に対して陪審裁判を求める権利がなくなるという主張は「あまりにも言語道断であり不当」と訴えた
Regarding Disney’s argument, Piccolo’s lawyer argued that the claim that signing up for a free trial of Disney Plus would eliminate the right to a jury trial against affiliates and subsidiaries is ``extraordinary and unjust.’’
Regarding Disney’s argument, Piccolo’s lawyer argued that the claim that signing up for a free trial of Disney Plus would eliminate the right to a jury trial against affiliates and subsidiaries is ``extraordinary and unjust.’’
「ディズニープラス」契約者は訴え起こせず、不法死亡訴訟でディズニー側が主張
The Disney Plus contractor does not appeal, and the Disney side claims in illegal death lawsuits.
The Disney Plus contractor does not appeal, and the Disney side claims in illegal death lawsuits.
米ディズニーのテーマパーク内の飲食店で食事をした後に急死した女性の夫が、ディズニー側に過失があったとしてウォルト・ディズニー・パークス＆リゾーツなどを訴えている裁判で、ディズニー側が原告の男性の「ディズニープラス」契約を理由に訴えを退けるよう求めている
A female husband who died suddenly after eating at a restaurant in the US Disney theme park is a trial in which the Disney side complains of Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, etc.We are asking you to rejuvenate the complaint due to the Disney Plus contract
A female husband who died suddenly after eating at a restaurant in the US Disney theme park is a trial in which the Disney side complains of Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, etc.We are asking you to rejuvenate the complaint due to the Disney Plus contract
原告は、ニューヨークの医師だった妻を亡くしたジェフリー・ピッコロさん
The plaintiff is Jeffrey Piccolo, who lost his wife who was a New York doctor.
The plaintiff is Jeffrey Piccolo, who lost his wife who was a New York doctor.
妻は２０２３年１０月にウォルト・ディズニー・ワールド内の飲食店で食事した後、激しいアレルギー反応を起こして死亡した
The wife died in a fierce allergic reaction after eating at a restaurant in Walt Disney World in October 2023.
The wife died in a fierce allergic reaction after eating at a restaurant in Walt Disney World in October 2023.
訴訟の中でピッコロさん側は、飲食店でアレルゲンがないことを何度も確認してメニューを注文したにもかかわらず、妻は乳製品とナッツに対するアレルギー反応を起こして死亡したと主張
In the lawsuit, Piccolo claimed that his wife had died due to allergic reactions to dairy and nuts, despite many times confirming that there was no allergen at a restaurant and ordered a menu.
In the lawsuit, Piccolo claimed that his wife had died due to allergic reactions to dairy and nuts, despite many times confirming that there was no allergen at a restaurant and ordered a menu.
ディズニーと飲食店側に過失があったとして、５万ドル（約７４０万円）超の損害賠償を求めている
He is seeking more than $ 50,000 (about 7.4 million yen) damages for negligence between Disney and the restaurant side.
He is seeking more than $ 50,000 (about 7.4 million yen) damages for negligence between Disney and the restaurant side.
これに対してディズニー側は、ピッコロさんが１９年に動画配信サービスのディズニープラスで１カ月の無料トライアルを契約していたことを理由に、訴えを退けるよう求めた
On the other hand, Disney sought to reject the complaint because Piccolo had contracted a one -month free trial at the Video Distribution Service Disney Plus in 1993.
On the other hand, Disney sought to reject the complaint because Piccolo had contracted a one -month free trial at the Video Distribution Service Disney Plus in 1993.
トライアル契約には、紛争が発生した場合は全てディズニーとの仲裁によって解決するという条項が含まれていた
The trial contract included a clause in which all disputes occurred by arbitration with Disney.
The trial contract included a clause in which all disputes occurred by arbitration with Disney.
ディズニー側はさらに、ピッコロさんがウォルト・ディズニー・パークスの公式サイトを利用して入園チケットを購入していたことを理由に、ピッコロさん側がディズニーを相手取って訴訟を起こすことはできないと主張している
The Disney side further argues that Mr. Piccolo would not be able to file a lawsuit against Disney because Piccolo had purchased an admission ticket using Walt Disney Parks official website.
The Disney side further argues that Mr. Piccolo would not be able to file a lawsuit against Disney because Piccolo had purchased an admission ticket using Walt Disney Parks official website.
ディズニー側の主張についてピッコロさんの弁護士は、ディズニープラスの無料トライアルを契約すると関連会社や子会社に対して陪審裁判を求める権利がなくなるという主張は「あまりにも言語道断であり不当」と訴えた
Regarding Disney`s claim, Piccolo`s lawyer claims that if you sign up for a free trial of Disney Plus, you will lose the right to ask affiliated companies and subsidiaries for jury trials.
Regarding Disney`s claim, Piccolo`s lawyer claims that if you sign up for a free trial of Disney Plus, you will lose the right to ask affiliated companies and subsidiaries for jury trials.
Home
Video
JLPT Test
Dictionary
Lesson
Topic
